The only issue is how long it takes for them to get banned.
Not a lot of staff are viewing the site when they're mainly in game.
Yes, some cheaters should be banned quicker but as long as they get banned there shouldn't be an issue.
What, why, how in the heck could it bother you that a person doesn’t get banned.
There’s always a reason for it, either:
1. They’re already banned (which is an even better thing, right????? Why would you be mad at this.)
2. Your evidence was insufficient which is your fault, not staff’s fault.
3. The reason you reported someone for is not bannable.
This could just be me, when I deal with reports like this where the player was already banned, but I don’t necessarily state that they are denied. I don’t see why they would be in a ”denied” state, when the reason is simply because they are already banned. They are not necessarily accepted either as that would mean the only evidence we have is on the report, which would not be the case as there is evidence elsewhere. I would hope that “Thankyou for reporting, but the player is already banned” means ‘we appreciate you reporting‘ to you, and that it’s not necessarily denied, it’s really just extra evidence which is always helpful. Not speaking on behalf of all staff, this is just how I deal with these reports, doubt i’m the only one though c:
Instead of saying the report being denied, they can just say “Thank you for reporting, player has been punished already, locked” instead of denying it or saying it’s denied if the evidence does clearly show enough to warrant a ban but being that as it may the player is already punished so denying it would make no sense. Best thing to do is for staff to say thank you and lock the report.